<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title/><link>https://www.thetarotforum.com/blogs/blog/34-the-taxonomy-of-decks-of-cards/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	How to avoid purchase of unintended decks, written mainly from a historical and typological point of view. This blog is intended to be helpful to beginners in particular.
</p>
]]></description><language>en</language><item><title>The cradle of tarot (So many decks 2)</title><link>https://www.thetarotforum.com/blogs/entry/341-the-cradle-of-tarot-so-many-decks-2/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	By the time playing card decks had become prevalent in Europe, the <strong>Kingdom of Sicily</strong> was the Korea of its time: There were <em>two</em> political entities claiming to be the<em> real</em> Kingdom of Sicily. This reminds us, that there was no unified Italy at the time. The old kingdom of Sicily split in 1282, and it wasn't until 1816 the two claimants reunited into one kingdom, the strangely named <em>Kingdom of the two Sicilies</em>. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	North of these two rivalling southern countries, <strong>the Papal States</strong> (Holy See) were located. Today, the Holy See oversees the world's smallest country, the principality of <em>Vatican City</em>, consisting of a few city blocks in the middle of the city of Rome, Italy, but in the Middle Ages, the land-claims of the Papal States were quite substantial, running from the west coast (Tyrrhenian Sea) to the east coast (Adriatic Sea). The bishop of Rome had become a head of state in 756, after a Frankish army defeated the Lombards, but the 14th and 15th centuries eroded some of the Pope's secular political power. From 1305 to 1378, popes resided in the Avignon enclave surrounded by Provence, and, in his absence, local aristocracy strengthened their secular power  over city states such as <strong>Ferrara, Modena and Reggio</strong> (House of Este) and <strong>Rimini</strong> (House of Malatesta). Another semi-autonomous city-republic formally under papal rule was <strong>Bologna</strong>, significant for its old university, founded in 1088 AD. The ecumenical council of Basel had begun its first session in 1431, but moved to Ferrara in 1438. Its purpose was to mend the schism between the Eastern Orthodox church and the Roman Catholic church. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Tuscany, north of the Papal States, had fallen apart in 1115, at the death of Matilda, Margravine of Tuscany, and was replaced by several long-lasting city-republics, the most important of which were <strong>Florence</strong>, <strong>Lucca </strong>and <strong>Siena</strong>. The <strong>Republic of Pisa</strong> was absorbed by the Republic of Florence in 1405. The House of Albizzi and the House of Medici were influential in Florence. Cosimo de' Medici, who was an aristocratic banker, returned in 1434 to Florence from exile in Venice and expelled the Albizzis. The ecumenical council of Ferrara moved to Florence in 1439, in order to avoid bubonic plague, and lated until 1445. The presence of learned Greeks in Florence made Greek literary works available, such as <em>Corpus Hermeticum</em>, the dialogues of Plato and the works of Plotinus and Proclus. Cosimo de' Medici attended lectures by the Byzantine neopagan philosopher Gemistos Plethon (1360-1454). After decades of intermittent war with Milan, Florence entered a period of peace when its neighbours, Milan and Venice, signed a peace treaty in 1454. From 1462, Medici sponsored the Florentine philosopher and translator Marsilio Ficino (1433-1499), who gathered a circle of thinkers, <em>the Florentine Academy</em>, around himself. One of the members was Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494), one of the first Christian Kabbalists and a cousin of the poet Matteo Maria Boiardo (1441-1494), the latter famous for his chivalric epic <em>Orlando Innamorato</em>. Sandro Botticelli was born in Florence in 1445. Leonardo da Vinci was born in the Republic of Florence in 1452. Michelangelo was born in the Republic of Florence in 1475.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Milan</strong> had been a city-republic, governed by several wealthy families, among them the House of Visconti and the House of Sforza, but became a duchy in 1349. A republic was proclaimed at the death of Duke Filippo Maria Visconti in 1447, but  in 1450, Francesco Sforza (married to Bianca Maria Visconti) dropped all pretense of governing a republic, and proclaimed himself Duke of Milan. He defeated Milan's eastern neighbour Venice in the following years.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>The Most Serene Republic of Venice</strong> was a very old country, founded in 697. Yes, 697 CE! <strong>Padoa</strong> and <strong>Verona</strong> became close allies after 1405. Trade with the East Roman (Byzantine) empire had favoured the economy of Venice for ages, but, when Constantinople fell to the Ottomans in 1453, Venetian economy took a hit. Intermittent naval war lasted from 1423 to 1571.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	West of the Duchy of Milan, the <strong>Republic of Genoa</strong> (lasted 1005-1797) was located. It controlled <strong>Corsica</strong> 1284-1755.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	North of Genoa, in a mountainous region, there were the <strong>Duchy of Savoy</strong>, the <strong>Duchy of Aosta</strong>, the <strong>Principality of Piedmont</strong> and the <strong>County of Nice</strong>; all of them ruled by the House of Savoy (much later kings of Italy).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Sardinia</strong> was under the Crown of Aragon (one of the Spanish kingdoms) for many centuries.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	There were also a few dozen other small political entities, but, of those, only <strong>The County of Monaco</strong> (since 1612 <em>The Principality of Monaco</em>) and the <strong>Republic of San Marino</strong> (independent 301 CE) ought to be mentioned, because they are still independent sovereign countries, but, as far as I know, none of them never developed any separate card deck or tarot deck of its own. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">341</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 23:24:47 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Just a few notes to myself, out of the sequential order of my 'normal' blog posts</title><link>https://www.thetarotforum.com/blogs/entry/240-just-a-few-notes-to-myself-out-of-the-sequential-order-of-my-normal-blog-posts/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I will return to the tarot deck of Bologna later on, when I have assembled my mind and my health decently, but just a note to myself here:
</p>

<p>
	Until 1725, Bolognese tarot had two female Popes (no Empress) and two male Popes (no Emperor), and a long succession of Popes had no reason to comment on this stylistic choice, until 1725. The Popesses and the Popes were replaced with four Moors, since exotification of foreigners was apparently all nice and dandy at the time. Bologna, boasting the world's oldest university, was located within the Papal States at the time (long before the unification of Italy), so the Papal administration had a say on what was allowed to be printed. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Another note to myself: Take a closer look at revolutionary French decks without Empress, Emperor, Kings, Queens and Jacks. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Another note to myself: Compare the Paris pattern and the Rouen pattern!!!
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">240</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 19:55:19 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>What does middle eastern judges have in common with German Jacks and Spanish playing cards? (So many decks 1)</title><link>https://www.thetarotforum.com/blogs/entry/116-what-does-middle-eastern-judges-have-in-common-with-german-jacks-and-spanish-playing-cards-so-many-decks-1/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Decks, decks, decks. There are so many of them. How do you tell them apart? Where did it all begin?
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	From the late 18th century to the mid-20th century there circulated a hypothesis, wild as it may seem now, that the tarot deck was invented in ancient Egypt – and with <em>ancient Egypt</em> I mean the time period <em>c. </em>2700 BCE to 395 CE, but please remember, that Egypt was under foreign administration (Persians, Græco-Macedonians and Romans) from 525 BCE.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Today, we know more about both ancient Egypt and the history of playing cards, than what was known in the 1780s. The Rosetta Stone and all that. Handbooks about card games available during my childhood often repeated the claim, that the ordinary 52 card playing card deck began as a <em>simplification</em> of the tarot deck, but it is now attested, that it is the other way round. Decks for card games consisting of 52 cards existed in Egypt during the high middle ages, and reproduced in Spain and Italy from the 1370s. The guesswork in the 1780s had been correct about the <em>geographical </em>origin, but missed the chronological mark with somewhere between 4100 and 700 years, and the significance of this is, that the raise of playing cards didn't occur in a pre-Christian polytheistic setting (as the Enlightenment Era thinkers had presumed, thinking that all the nice symbols on tarot cards are surviving <em>hieroglyphics</em>), but in a predominantly<em> Islamic</em> culture (with a significant Coptic Christian minority) and <em>without</em> the 22 trumps that makes tarot decks so famous. Both Egyptian, Spanish and Italian playing cards had four suits, easily recognised by today's tarot readers: Swords, Sticks, Cups and Coins.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	All court cards were originally male: A sultan and two officials with the title <em>nā'ib</em>, which means 'representative'. In the past, that word could, among other meanings, refer to an assistant judge, but it could also refer to a vice-regent or other types of officials. Today we are mainly familiar with a court consisting of a king, a queen and a jack, but some traditional German decks (and I will return to them in a later blogpost) still preserve one male <strong>Ober</strong> (Upper) knave and one male <strong>Unter</strong> (Lower) knave, which is a remarkable example of how<em> slowly </em>the taste of card game players may change over centuries. As for the word <em>nā'ib</em>, it still survives in the Spanish word for playing card, <em>naipes</em>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In due season, I will focus my attention on tarot decks proper (the well-known 78 card version, of course, but also the less known 64 card version from Sicily, the 62 card version from Bologna and some other overlooked versions or derivations). Before that, I will take a look at how <em>ordinary playing cards</em> evolved. They do not look the same everywhere. Though the four old suit marks survived with only minor changes in Spain, in most-but-not-all parts of the Italian peninsula, in the tarot deck, in the minchiate deck and in the aluette deck, already in the mid-15th century they were adapted into (Spade-shaped) Leaves, Acorns, Hearts and Bells in many German-speaking principalities. This latter German set of suite marks formed, in turn, the basis for the French suits, which are well known in many parts of the world today: Spades, Clubs, Hearts and Diamonds.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Something often forgotten by the present generation, particularly outside of Italy and Germany, is how<em> late </em>Italy and Germany became united countries, in 1861 and 1871, respectively. Gaming habits do not die swiftly. The former countries, out of which Italy and Germany were united, still cultivate regional identities, and the decks and games popular in any particular region often go back for centuries. This factor also cause consequences for divination methods. Regional cartomancy methods in the past were, of course, based on the particular deck or decks popular among card players in each of these regions at the time. Foreign decks lost competitive strength, because of customs duties, even if the place of origin of these decks were just in the neighbouring principality, where decks looked differently, and other card games were popular. Therefore, it isn't irrelevant for card readers to know something about regional playing card decks. It was out of them many decks, later designed for explicit cartomantic use, evolved.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<em>To be continued.</em>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">116</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2024 03:38:19 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The main idea with this blog</title><link>https://www.thetarotforum.com/blogs/entry/115-the-main-idea-with-this-blog/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	When I now look back on the past thirty-five years, or actually more, I wish I had learned certain things before I bought some decks, and I wish to help others avoid buying another deck than they intended to buy.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For instance, someone, who wish to buy a <em>Sibilla deck</em>, and not something else than a <em>Sibilla deck</em>, should know, that a <em>Sibilla Indovina</em> does not follow the structure generally known as a 'Sibilla' (I will return to this subject matter in a later blogpost). Similarly, <a contenteditable="false" data-ipshover="" data-ipshover-target="https://www.thetarotforum.com/profile/704-reall/?do=hovercard" data-mentionid="704" href="https://www.thetarotforum.com/profile/704-reall/" rel="">@reall</a> remarked four years ago, that people in their surroundings think of the 36 card <em>Traditionelle Wahrsagekarten</em> deck, when they ask for 'a tarot deck'. It follows, that these persons would be surprised (and maybe disappointed), if they ended up with an actual 78 card tarot deck derived from Milanese tarot instead, because that wasn't what they expected. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The field may seem overwhelming at first, so I will try to –step by step– disentangle the confusion surrounding the matter, as far as my knowledge goes, and write a <em>buyer's guide</em>, as it were. I admit, that I have still very much to learn, and some parts of the landscape are still foreign terrain to me. However: buyer's remorse can be avoided. In a manner, I will try to pass the torch. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Experienced diviners, art historians or folklorists will not find any surprising here.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<em>To be continued.</em>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">115</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 23:36:50 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
