Jump to content
  • entries
    32
  • comments
    100
  • views
    2,568

"The Compleat Solarian" - A Lesson Learned


AUTHOR’S NOTE: File under “Every card has both positive and negative meanings.”

 

It is generally assumed that the Sun is an entirely favorable card that bodes no evil; even when reversed it suggests a “passing cloud” rather than a gloomy long-range forecast. But there is another way to look at it.

 

I recently performed a professional reading for a client who was facing a bureaucratic gauntlet of reviews and approvals and wanted to know how it would fare. The upright Sun was the outcome card, suggesting that it would all work out for the best in the end. When it didn’t, at least in the short term (there may be a “Plan B” in the offing), I did a postmortem on the reading to see what might be learned.

 

In the past I’ve written that the Sun when upright can imply “too much of a good thing.” This can manifest as a bad sunburn, or as an uncomfortable revelation that ideally should have remained under wraps. In the second case I described it as “The glare of the Sun illuminates all the dark corners and leaves nothing concealed, particularly those things that can’t withstand the light of day.”

 

In the case at hand, although no justification was given for the refusal, in retrospect it looked to me like something shady about the submittal may have come to light during a slapdash review by the bored paper-pushers (there is a story behind that perception in the other cards that I won’t get into*) that triggered a rejection. My suspicion is that the shortcoming would have been more serious than merely failing to “check all the boxes.” It originally struck me that the apathetic officials would not delve too deeply into the background of the application, but perhaps they didn’t have to, and being the plodding sluggards that the cards convinced me they were, they dismissed the proposal summarily without bestirring themselves to offer remedial advice.

 

The lesson for me is to explore both faces of the Sun during a reading and not draw my conclusions entirely from its optimistic “bright side” without poking into the dimmer recesses. It may be a stretch to find the concurrent negativity but, as this instance clearly shows, ignoring the potential can leave half the story untold. In the “soundtrack of my life” I can now hear the Rolling Stones chiding me about having had “another standing in the shadow,” but it seems I wasn’t listening at the time. Give me a piece of chalk and I’ll write on the blackboard 100 times: “Every card has both positive and negative meanings.”

 

*OK, OK, here you go! My spread had five positions: a “Current Situation” card (in this pull it was the Thoth 6 of Disks, auguring “Success” whereas the RWS version only promises “disbursement;” this was the first “red herring” but I saw no cause for alarm); two “In-Process Factor” cards that will either reinforce or offset one another (more on those below); an “Action” card showing how to proceed (here it was the Aeon [Judgement], about which Aleister Crowley said “always represents the taking of a definite step;” I advised my client to act promptly to nudge the matter in the most auspicious direction but the verdict came back too soon for that to happen); and an “Outcome” card (the allegedly glorious Sun as noted above).

 

The “In-Process Factors” gave me the most pause: they were the Thoth Knight (RWS King) of Cups, Mr. “I Don’t Want to Stick My Neck Out,” and the Thoth Knight of Disks/Pentacles, Mr. “I’m Going Strictly by the Book Here.” They were most likely senior public servants who were just putting in their time so they didn’t even break a sweat in their denial of approval.

6 Comments


Recommended Comments

Chariot

Posted

Interesting reading.  As you don't know exactly what DID cause the rejection, it's hard to be clear what the cards were telling you.

The Sun is a card I've never enjoyed getting, to be honest.  Rather than 'illuminating all corners' it actually tends to blind us to anything that isn't right under our noses.  Most depictions of The Sun in the RWS system (which I use) illustrate the sun as huge, and we only see something close up ...usually that child on a horse in a fairly enclosed space.  However, I have a couple of decks where the sun is actually so bright there is basically nothing else to see.  I know The Sun card doesn't make me feel all warm and furry ...it makes  me want to turn my back, and possibly find a place to hide.  I actually view the reversed Sun as more beneficial, because it's not so bright, and usually allows us to actually see what it's illuminating.

Without knowing what actually caused your client to not get the job, I wonder if maybe the people involved in the interview were actually only seeing what was in front of them, but were unable to see the client's background much at all.   Maybe they didn't even look?

As I work with the cards I often begin to feel some aspect of them more strongly than others.  For me, Judgement has now come to mean 'nothing you can do to influence matters now—you will be judged on what you have already done.'  (Reversal means there is still time to tweak the situation.) So that might play in to this reading as well. In other words, in terms of 'action' there was  nothing more the applicant could do.   The interviewers would see what they wanted to see, and that was that.

Again, going with the RWS meaning of the 6 of Disks ...the give and take is of an unequal nature. The giver can be generous, or not. The recipient can't really do anything about what they get (or don't get.)  This is the 'charity' card, in RWS anyway.  

All in all, this situation you read about seems to indicate that your client was really powerless to influence the decision. The decision was, in essence, already made?  Dunno.  Interesting, though.  Just goes to show how difficult it can be to get a supremely accurate reading.  I would probably have come to the same conclusion as you did, on that occasion.  Although, again, the Sun is really all about illumination ...not so much about success, I reckon.

 

Barleywine

Posted

1 hour ago, Chariot said:

Interesting reading.  As you don't know exactly what DID cause the rejection, it's hard to be clear what the cards were telling you.

The Sun is a card I've never enjoyed getting, to be honest.  Rather than 'illuminating all corners' it actually tends to blind us to anything that isn't right under our noses.  Most depictions of The Sun in the RWS system (which I use) illustrate the sun as huge, and we only see something close up ...usually that child on a horse in a fairly enclosed space.  However, I have a couple of decks where the sun is actually so bright there is basically nothing else to see.  I know The Sun card doesn't make me feel all warm and furry ...it makes  me want to turn my back, and possibly find a place to hide.  I actually view the reversed Sun as more beneficial, because it's not so bright, and usually allows us to actually see what it's illuminating.

Without knowing what actually caused your client to not get the job, I wonder if maybe the people involved in the interview were actually only seeing what was in front of them, but were unable to see the client's background much at all.   Maybe they didn't even look?

As I work with the cards I often begin to feel some aspect of them more strongly than others.  For me, Judgement has now come to mean 'nothing you can do to influence matters now—you will be judged on what you have already done.'  (Reversal means there is still time to tweak the situation.) So that might play in to this reading as well. In other words, in terms of 'action' there was  nothing more the applicant could do.   The interviewers would see what they wanted to see, and that was that.

Again, going with the RWS meaning of the 6 of Disks ...the give and take is of an unequal nature. The giver can be generous, or not. The recipient can't really do anything about what they get (or don't get.)  This is the 'charity' card, in RWS anyway.  

All in all, this situation you read about seems to indicate that your client was really powerless to influence the decision. The decision was, in essence, already made?  Dunno.  Interesting, though.  Just goes to show how difficult it can be to get a supremely accurate reading.  I would probably have come to the same conclusion as you did, on that occasion.  Although, again, the Sun is really all about illumination ...not so much about success, I reckon.

 

This was a case of "inductive" rather than "deductive" analysis. I had the conclusion and I attempted to backtrack into the cause. Although I asked, my client didn't answer whether he/she had received any indication from the authorities regarding what was wrong with the application. As noted, I had also advised the querent to be proactive but there seemed to be a reluctance to engage despite the individual acting as an agent for the applicant. Regarding the Sun, anything beyond the traditional meaning of "success" would seem to be "spin" based on our personal experience. I know I do it with all the cards.

JoyousGirl

Posted

Well the initial card (in RWS) implies a weighing up, however I'm going to say here that Kings as the last word may not necessarily mean people.

 

Cups to me are either empty or full, or some other level in between, either being emptied or filling up.  That could mean something like a score out of 10 for responses.

Pentacles are trade - or a sort of blending of multiple earthy factors such as a hybrid plant - and can include health as well as actual coins. We might take that a little freely here and say the health of the application as a whole (total value). 

 

Two Kings, as the last word, may mean a box ticking exercise or algorithm might be responsible. I'm not sure which card implies algorithms, but for all of us in this age, identifying what cards indicate AI and algorithms and other computing engagements with humans would be handy.

 

First example: I got a response to an email inquiry by an AI thingy the other day.

 

Another example: A woman rang me about a job application I submitted. She suggested she went into some computer portal to see what other options may have been overlooked. My application was in there, and she followed me up because I sounded interesting. So there was "Applicant tracking software" processing job applications before anyone even looked at them (people don't even look at them if you don't put in the right keywords - even if you're the best person for the job).  So consider just about everything is now expected to be filled by an online form (development application - or just about any other application).  This is supposedly for efficiency and avoiding bias. 

 

Just a contribution - possibly useless, but some more food for thought.

Barleywine

Posted

Because there was an administrative review and approval process involved, the most obvious interpretation of the Kings was as bureaucrats who stood in the way of success, an assumption with which the client - who is familiar with tarot - agreed. This was not in the US but in an apparently less electronically-advanced country (I'm not sure which one except that it is somewhere in Europe, probably eastern since "Bulgaria" came up in conversation).

JoyousGirl

Posted

If there's no division of "in process" I'd be going with a national policy then. 

 

Don't count those Eastern Europeans out. Romania has faster internet than Australia, and I think they don't allow non-citizens to buy property there - which is very fair in my view, considering how wealthier nations' citizens can accumulate and leave the poorer unable to live in their own country. I know many Malagasy are happy living off the land and sea, but multinational corporations such as miners take over their homelands promising monetary compensation that they never pay. Anyway, just more babble from me 😄

 

Barleywine

Posted

1 hour ago, JoyousGirl said:

If there's no division of "in process" I'd be going with a national policy then. 

 

Don't count those Eastern Europeans out. Romania has faster internet than Australia, and I think they don't allow non-citizens to buy property there - which is very fair in my view, considering how wealthier nations' citizens can accumulate and leave the poorer unable to live in their own country. I know many Malagasy are happy living off the land and sea, but multinational corporations such as miners take over their homelands promising monetary compensation that they never pay. Anyway, just more babble from me 😄

 

The US is obsessed with having EVERYTHING done via AI. My impression has been that Europe is more rational about it.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.