devin Posted June 26, 2020 Author Posted June 26, 2020 (edited) And, man, that last bit is a brutal whack at Pollack. As an aside, I would have answered that weather in October question. Bring it on! Edited June 26, 2020 by devin
reall Posted June 26, 2020 Posted June 26, 2020 just to say I like Bright Colors & compositions!:) your father is talented artist!:) & agree we are lucky to have Print on Demand!:)
gregory Posted June 26, 2020 Posted June 26, 2020 59 minutes ago, devin said: Being so out of date is a rather disconcerting feeling. Thanks for the read, though. Regardless, while the deck might be somewhat patchy, and despite the fact that I don't own a copy, it does have its successes. Oh sure - but lionising it because DALI is not - right, I guess I mean. It was sheer luck I happened to read the Guardian in the days that that was published ! I can see why Pollack was unconcerned though - she never wrote it up as Isn't Dali Fab; more as this is what I get from this card - and that is absolutely fair enough.
devin Posted June 26, 2020 Author Posted June 26, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, reall said: I'm expert so far so feel free to ask if you need help with anything!:) also be sure to check my How to Create Print & Publish your own Tarot guide!:) I know you are and may very well take you up on that supremely kind offer. 💗 2 hours ago, gregory said: I can see why Pollack was unconcerned though - she never wrote it up as Isn't Dali Fab; more as this is what I get from this card - and that is absolutely fair enough. 'Twas more the bit about being accused of lumpen cold reading. But I do sympathize. The idea of a Guardian writer opening up both barrels of snark on one of my readings is absolutely terrifying. Then again, Pollack is more on the psychological side of things, so it's less of an insult, I suppose. Very interesting reading all round. Thanks again! Edited June 26, 2020 by devin
Recommended Posts